I'm not here to be silent

© everlark

victhechaosgoat:

I am now taking commissions! 

Prices: 

(All prices are in $USD and are *per character* unless otherwise noted. I can only accept payments via PayPal, sorry.)

Sketches:

  • Portrait/bust - $5
  • Full Body - $10
  • One-Panel Comic: $15 (flat rate)

Line Art:

  • Portrait - $10
  • Torso - $15
  • Full Body - $20
  • Action Shot - $20-$30 (scales with complexity)

Simple Colors:

  • Portrait - $15
  • Torso - $20
  • Full Body - $25
  • Action Shot - $25-$35 (scales with complexity)

Full Colors:

  • Portrait - $25
  • Torso - $30
  • Full Body & Action Shots (w/ simple background) - $35-$50 (scales with complexity)

Other Info:

What I do:

  • Character portraits
  • Single-panel comics
  • Action-shots
  • OCs, Canon Favorites, and Wacky Crossovers
  • For samples of my work, visit my DeviantArt page

What I don’t do:

  • Gore (blood is fine, within reason)
  • Dicks (and/or balls)
  • Characters fucking, sucking, or otherwise doing things that would make my granny blush if she ever saw it
  • Furries (if it’s not canon anthro, it’s a furry)

reserve the right to refuse requests that I find to be offensive or that I do not feel comfortable with.

I reserve the right to charge an additional fee for especially complex costumes, tattoos, and/or backgrounds. This fee will be negotiated, in advance, with the client.

Requesting a Commission:

To request a commission, please send an ask to victhechaosgoat with the following information

  • How much you are willing/able to spend
  • A description of the scene and/or character(s) you would like

  ·  16  ·


its-ga-linda-with-a-ga:

"we’re not queerbaiting these characters"

image


  ·  12311  ·


celestialartist:

Seth interrupts an ALS Ice Bucket Challenge

Also there was too much echo n the video during the thing with the question mark so I guessed.


  ·  907  ·


pandorasprings:

veganflowers:

postracialcomments:

postracialcomments:

postracialcomments:

postracialcomments:

Yall…….Chris Hayes.. (not confirmed yet)

Recent news coverage via The Wire.

other important info from that article: amnesty international has sent a human rights team, the first time in the u.s.


  ·  21211  ·


tevlek:

iplemons:

juvi-fullbuster:

there are people in the fandom who can

  • write fanfictions
  • draw fanarts
  • create gifs
  • think of theories
  • edit stuff

and then there’s me

But there’s you, who

  • Read our fanfictions
  • Like/Reblog/Commission us for our fanarts
  • View our gifs
  • Support our theories
  • Are amused by our edits

You are just as important as the rest of us.

All the fandoms should see this.

  ·  50096  ·


reverseracism:

mvgl:

The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air 2x09 - “Cased Up” (November 11, 1991)

Relevant.


  ·  243113  ·


thehpalliance:

If you use YouTube, you need to know this.
You’ve heard all these rumblings about Net Neutrality over the past several months. Let’s get real: this is about controlling online video. It is estimated that by 2017, video content will account for 80-90% of all global Internet traffic.
This isn’t just about not being able to binge-watch a series on Netflix. It’s about the future of online video as we know it.
Whether your YouTube channel is home to daily vlogs, short films, or just that one video from when the cinnamon challenge seemed like a good idea, you’re a video creator. Your content and comments help shape this community. Let’s keep it that way.
Net Neutrality means that your YouTube videos reach people at the same speed as clips from last night’s episode of the Tonight Show. It means a level playing field for video creators looking to reach an audience. But new Net Neutrality rules could mess that up.
Here’s the deal: Telecommunications companies already charge us to access the Internet through our homes and our phones. New FCC rules could allow them to also charge content providers (like YouTube, Netflix, and even PBS) for access to our eyeballs. It could create a fast lane for Jimmy Fallon’s clips, and slow lane for your YouTube videos.
It is really important that the FCC understands that online video creators care about Net Neutrality. Even if you’ve only ever uploaded ONE VIDEO, you are a creator and you have a voice.
If you can, please add your channel to our petition. We’ll deliver this to the FCC in September and demonstrate that the online video community cares about this issue. 
Sign the petition, then spread the word.

thehpalliance:

If you use YouTube, you need to know this.

You’ve heard all these rumblings about Net Neutrality over the past several months. Let’s get real: this is about controlling online video. It is estimated that by 2017, video content will account for 80-90% of all global Internet traffic.

This isn’t just about not being able to binge-watch a series on Netflix. It’s about the future of online video as we know it.

Whether your YouTube channel is home to daily vlogs, short films, or just that one video from when the cinnamon challenge seemed like a good idea, you’re a video creator. Your content and comments help shape this community. Let’s keep it that way.

Net Neutrality means that your YouTube videos reach people at the same speed as clips from last night’s episode of the Tonight Show. It means a level playing field for video creators looking to reach an audience. But new Net Neutrality rules could mess that up.

Here’s the deal: Telecommunications companies already charge us to access the Internet through our homes and our phones. New FCC rules could allow them to also charge content providers (like YouTube, Netflix, and even PBS) for access to our eyeballs. It could create a fast lane for Jimmy Fallon’s clips, and slow lane for your YouTube videos.

It is really important that the FCC understands that online video creators care about Net Neutrality. Even if you’ve only ever uploaded ONE VIDEO, you are a creator and you have a voice.

If you can, please add your channel to our petition. We’ll deliver this to the FCC in September and demonstrate that the online video community cares about this issue.

Sign the petition, then spread the word.


  ·  38007  ·


"I want to mourn the deaths of Mike Brown and Eric Garner and Trayvon Martin, and I want to question why the deaths of Renisha McBride and Islan Nettles and Kathryn Johnston haven’t gotten similar traction. Why the beating of Marlene Pinnock isn’t on all of our lips. Why the nation is not familiar with the names of Stephanie Maldonado, or of Ersula Ore. And how many women’s names do we not know because they don’t dare come forward? Because the violence they experience at the hands of the police is sexual, and the shame and stigma around sexual violence silences them?"

 
-

Why don’t we hear about women victims of state violence?

on the role of misogyny, transmisogyny, and respectability politics in which state violence against people of color makes news.

(via disabilityhistory)


  ·  1326  ·


commander-kulan:

llhayne

commander-kulan:

llhayne

(Source: mamandil)


  ·  2197  ·


HONESTLY: REBLOG THIS IF YOU HAVE EVER SELF HARMED IN ANY WAY, SKIPPED A MEAL ON PURPOSE, BEEN DEPRESSED, FELT ALONE IN A CROWDED ROOM, HATED YOUR BODY, HATED YOURSELF, FELT LIKE YOUR NOT GOOD ENOUGH OR BEEN TOLD YOU WERENT, CRIED YOURSELF TO SLEEP, FELT SUICIDAL OR BEEN SUICIDAL 

stckonyou:

brxken—memories:

phanexistentialcrisis:

goskinnygirl13:

thirstywolf:

nurselisainohio:

Being honest here. *nervously*

I hate how many notes this has…and that I’m reblogging it..

Too many notes…way too many

uh…

every single one… oh

(Source: uhsorry)


  ·  260101  ·